Interprofessional Network Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Interprofessional Network - Case Study Examplesional network found on the prevailing case study include from presiding judges, family court judges, court administrators, family court specialists, and program managers. Interpersonal associations among the responsible parties for the management of the family are significant (Knapp & Barnard, 1998). in that location is the value in regard to the professionalism being utilized in the description of the principles and values of the merged family court as demonstrated by an individual heedless of whether the underlying member is a registered profession. The framework of the interprofessional network is mainly based on the evidence that is being interprofessional enhances profession specific identity.Development of the client-focused interprofessional network of the integrated family court mainly incorporated professional such(prenominal) as presiding judges, family court judges, court administrators, family court specialists, and progr am managers. The concept of an integrated Family Court system applies to legion(predicate) jurisdictions and possesses complexities in regard to executing of the procedures. Presiding judges in the integrated family courts serve the function of overseeing the whole process of the court proceeding (Knapp & Barnard, 1998). Moreover, the presiding judges ensure that thither is fair trial for the family that would accomplish the jurisdictions unification of the family court.In contrast the standard juridical systems case management of such matters is mainly based on the adversarial system, which adjudicates specific discrete issues in preparation for the trial an approach that is criticized for not being responsive to the dynamics of families in crisis. The judicial system is normally criticized by underlying parents and attorneys, and in corresponding in numerous cases judges, for trying to squeeze the problems of families in crisis into the prevailing traditional adversarial models with all the rules of the cultivated and criminal courts. Moreover, there has